<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Hyperbole</title>
      <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/</link>
      <description>Hyperbolic ruminations of a tired mind...</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:03:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Misdirection (or the consequences, unintended or otherwise, of the financial crisis)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I was talking with <a href="http://poetic-mama.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">my wife</a> a few nights ago, fretting about the ever-deepening (and broadening) financial crisis, and she stopped me and asked, "Why are you worrying about this?"</p>

<p>I thought about this for awhile.  I realized (and we further discussed) that this is not something we need to worry about.  God has provided for our family thus far, and we have no reason to believe that won't continue.  What that <em>means</em> may change significantly, and our lifestyle may have to make a radical shift.  But what of it?  Here's the truth: <strong>the things that I derive my quality-of-life from will be largely unaffected by our financial state.</strong></p>

<p>I quickly realized in that conversation that my worrying and obsessing about the financial markets were distracting me from the things I'm <em>really</em> worried about.  I'm not worried so much about losing our money; in our lives I expect to see both lean times and fat, and we will tighten and loosen our belts as needed.  We will survive, regardless.  What I'm <em>really</em> worried about is losing our freedoms.</p>

<p>The more we (and by we I mean our nation, collectively) divert our energies to obsessing about the global financial meltdown, the less we will notice the ongoing erosion of the freedoms our country was established to bring about.</p>

<p>I predict (at least) one of two things will happen.  (Perhaps both.)<br />
<ol><br />
<li>Insidious acts or changes will be committed by our leaders and go largely unnoticed amidst the torrent of "bad news", AND/OR<br />
<li>Terrible policy changes will be enacted in plain sight, justified as balms for the ailing financial situation.</li><br />
</ol></p>

<p>Yes, #2 has already happened more than once – but I don't think we've seen the worst of it yet.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/10/misdirection_or_the_consequenc.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/10/misdirection_or_the_consequenc.html</guid>
         <category>News and Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:03:07 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>I Am a Conspiracy Theory Nut-Job</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>No.  Not really.  But the thing that's been lurking in a deep, dark corner in the back of my mind started appearing on the internet recently, emanating from the "lunatic fringe."  The thing that is strange to me is that the thought first appeared to my mind circa mid-2004.</p>

<p>It feels strange to type this; the thing that has been lurking in a deep, dark corner in the back of my mind is something I don't actually <em>believe</em> will really happen.  At least, I don't believe it anywhere but in that deep, dark corner in the back of my mind.</p>

<p>The idea that has been lurking in a deep, dark corner in the back of my mind is this: on November 4th, 2008, no polls will open.  Or maybe, only some of them will open.  Or perhaps they will close abruptly.  Insert some value for incomplete/improper/invalid/non-existent election into the equation and that's what it is.</p>

<p>The thing that planted this in my head in the first place – four long years ago – was one of the main campaign slogans of our incumbent president: "can't switch horses in the middle of a race" (and many more folksy variants thereof.)  Here was my thinking: I <a href="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2004/09/the_democrats_just_dont_get_it.html">wrote back in 2004 that the president's real agenda is <em>war without end</em>.</a>  If you take this and draw out the above slogan to its logical conclusion, the so-called "horse race" is still going on, ergo we should "not switch horses."  I just searched my own blog, and found that I actually wrote about this, how it irked me then, and how silly I thought it was.  The entry was called "<a href="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2004/09/horse_race.html">Horse Race</a>."</p>

<p>A lot has happened since 2004.  Many of the seeds of autocracy have been sewn into the fabric of our society; this process has been going on since the events of September 2001.  No, I'm not suggesting (as so many other conspiracy theory nut-job types have) that those in power <em>predicated</em> the tragic events of September 11th; merely that they exploited it.  Before 2004 we saw the Patriot act, the scapegoating of Muslims, Arabs, and many other groups that supposedly resemble Muslims and Arabs (even Sikhs!  Madness!)  Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq, "Mission Accomplished", and the establishment of out-of-system prisons run by the military.  Since 2004 we've seen warrantless wiretaps, government mining of domestic telephone call records, the establishment of a network of secret prisons, significant tightening of journalistic freedoms (followed by a lot of journalistic capitulation), senseless, mass arrests (think both major parties' political conventions, both in 2004 and 2008), I could go on.  And now, just in the last few days we have the <a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/">deployment of U.S. troops to... the U.S.</a> and <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081005-new-surveillance-program-will-turn-military-satellites-on-us.html">U.S. military spy satellites pointed at... the U.S.</a>  (Remember <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089886/">Real Genius</a> and the "Crossbow"?  Okay, maybe not that.)</p>

<p>So I don't <em>actually</em> believe that this is going to happen, or even anything resembling it.  I do believe we've already ceded too many of the freedoms we should cherish and protect.  I also think it will be irresistible for the next president (whomever that might be, even if it's the "Chosen One") to hold on to a lot of the newly endowed (or recently left unchecked) powers that the presidency has acquired.  If it weren't for all of those things I mentioned above (and countless more I don't even bother to mention), the thing that has been lurking in a deep, dark corner in the back of my mind would have died long ago.  It lives on though, albeit contained to the recesses of my psyche.  I expect that will be where it stays until it finally dies on November 5th.</p>

<p>So you can't really call me a nut-job.  Unless you want to.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/10/i_am_a_conspiracy_theory_nutjo.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/10/i_am_a_conspiracy_theory_nutjo.html</guid>
         <category>News and Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:38:28 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>On Having Three Children, redux</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>...or "Allow myself to TrackBack...myself."</p>

<p>Almost a year and a half ago I wrote <a href="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/04/on_having_three_children.html">this post</a>.  I'm writing now to tell you that my aphoristic statement still holds: <em>Raising three children is much like raising two, except there is one more of them.</em> To me, having the one more makes it infinitely more rewarding; but it really isn't any harder, at least not so far.  Sometimes it can be a slightly harder, especially because they are so close in age.  (Consider the logistics of taking all three to a highway rest area bathroom so one of them can use the facilities.)  But that same issue makes it easier sometimes, since they are better playmates for it.</p>

<p>So if you have two children, don't be afraid of another, it really is quite wonderful.</p>

<p>(This is the part where someone asks me when we're having our next child.  We're done, thanks, we've hit the target. :)</p>

<p>Nods to <a href="http://www.seruyange.com/david/">David Seruyange</a> for reminding me of this post.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/08/on_having_three_children_redux.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/08/on_having_three_children_redux.html</guid>
         <category>Parenthood</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:15:23 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Back up!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>...but did you even notice I was down? :)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/08/back_up.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/08/back_up.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:33:32 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Irony at 100m</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here's another story to add to the whole that is my ironic life:</p>

<p>Went on vacation to Puerto Vallarta last week.  First time to Mexico-South-of-Frontera-BC.  Went parasailing!  First time ever.  Always wanted to try it.  I was third to go (my dad and wife went before me), and we were all getting hungry for lunch.  After they rigged me to fly I had to wait a long time (the boat was pulling "the banana", a water-toboggan-thingy, and the passengers kept purposely falling off, forcing the boat to stop and wait for them to get back on.)  Anyhow, finally the boat returned, they hooked up my tow line, and I was off and flying.  Parasailing is awesome!  It's really breathtaking...I highly recommend it (despite what I'm about to tell you next.)  The only part of the experience I missed having was landing back on the beach – I got dropped in the drink instead. :) As it turns out, the boat ran out of fuel.  Fortunately, the tropical Pacific is plenty warm (even in March), and I was wearing a life vest of course so treading water was no problem.  And I got a free WaveRunner ride out of it to boot! :)</p>

<p>My wife knows me well enough not to worry (once she could see I was afloat), my kids worried only a little bit, and my mother might have had kittens.  I personally had a blast. :)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/03/irony_at_100m.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/03/irony_at_100m.html</guid>
         <category>Personal</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:17:43 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Clinton vs. McCain</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I've said it to anyone who would listen, and now I'm going to blog it.  I have no polls, facts, figures, statistics, or damned lies to back this up; this is solely my personal opinion based on "gut" instincts.  Here it is:</p>

<p><em>In a <a href="http://clinton.senate.gov/">(H.R.) Clinton</a> vs. <a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">McCain</a> presidential contest, <strong><a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">McCain</a> wins in a landslide</strong>.</em></p>

<p>That's it.  If you are a Democrat (by registration, anyway), and you want a Democratic president to be elected in November, vote for <a href="http://obama.senate.gov/">Barack Obama</a>; he has a fighting chance against <a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">McCain</a> for independent voters.  In a <a href="http://clinton.senate.gov/">Clinton</a>/<a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">McCain</a> bout, independents will fly to <a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">McCain</a> who they recognize as one of the most independent (read, not beholden to party leadership) members of the Senate.  (Conversely, Hillary Clinton is perceived by independents as a party wonk.)</p>

<p>Incidentally, IMHO (assuming <a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">McCain</a> wins the Republican nomination) all <a href="http://mccain.senate.gov/">McCain</a> need to do to win the presidency against any challenger is to enlist his Senate Democratic counterpart (his comrade-in-laws) <a href="http://feingold.senate.gov/">Russell Feingold</a> as his running mate; the two of them would be unstoppable.<br />
&lt;EOM&gt;</p>

<p>P.S. - Yes, I'm still alive.<br />
P.P.S - I am a registered Democrat because of more issue alignment, though not a partisan.<br />
P.P.P.S. - Barack Obama is the only of the field of Democratic candidates I can vote for without "holding my nose."  I actually like him as a candidate.  He's not the <a href="http://www.draftgore.com/">guy I actually wanted</a>, though.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/02/clinton_vs_mccain.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2008/02/clinton_vs_mccain.html</guid>
         <category>News and Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:34:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>iPhone review in process</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Just an FYI: I've started writing a review of my iPhone experience thus far. I know some people were waiting for it. (That's you, <a href="http://kasei.us/archives/2007/06/30/iphone" target="_blank">Greg</a> :)</p>

<p>Watch this space!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/07/iphone_review_in_process.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/07/iphone_review_in_process.html</guid>
         <category>iPhone</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:16:33 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>I&apos;m a sucker...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>So I'm writing this blog from my new iPhone. Yes, I took the plunge-- I <em>stood in line</em> and got one in hour one. I will probably write more on the subject later. More to come...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/im_a_sucker_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/im_a_sucker_1.html</guid>
         <category>iPhone</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 18:55:44 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>80GB iPhone?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>So I was just watching the recently posted <a title="Apple - iPhone - Activation & Sync video" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/usingiphone/activation.html">Apple - iPhone - Activation & Sync video</a> and something caught my eye: during the demonstration of iPhone sync features, it was clear that the presenter's iPhone has 80GB of space.  Check this out:</p>

<p><img alt="80GB iPhone.png" src="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/images/80GB%20iPhone.png" width="829" height="138" /></p>

<hr />

<p>I just went back to the video, and it's already changed!  Now it's 8GB!</p>

<p>Something is fishy...</p>

<p>UPDATE:<br />
Looks like Engaget caught this too:<br />
http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/26/80gb-iphone/<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/80gb_iphone_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/80gb_iphone_1.html</guid>
         <category>Tech</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:30:15 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Will iPhone JavaScript engine hook multi-touch gestures?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of hullaballoo in the Mac developer community about <http://www.apple.com/>Apple</a>'s decision to make <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/internet/" target="_blank">Safari</a>, or "Web 2.0" &lt;cough&gt; the "SDK" for the <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone</a> (in lieu of an actual "SDK", maybe even some sort of <a href="http://www.apple.com/xcode/" target="_blank">XCode</a> plugin.)  Without going into the miry mud of this debate, the burning question I have about this revolves around the part of the <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone</a> technology I would most like to experiment with: <strong>will the <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/" target="_blank">iPhone</a> <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/internet/" target="_blank">Safari browser</a> make it possible to write a JavaScript app/widget that can respond to multi-touch gestures.</strong></p>

<p>As I see there, there are three ways they could expose this:<br />
<ol><br />
<li>A high-level API with a collection of hooks for the various gestures used in native iPhone apps.<br/><br />
(e.g., <em>pinch horizontal/vertical, spread horizontal/vertical, chord horizontal/vertical</em>, and maybe some idioms for new single-touch patterns like <em>toss up/down</em>, or whatever they're calling it.)</li><br />
<li>A low-level API that gives raw (or barely normalized) data about gestures<br/><br />
(e.g., reports position pairs)</li><br />
<li>Both of the above</li><br />
</ol></p>

<p>As I see it, if they could expose both high and low level tracking for gestures, they would gain immediate benefit from developers implementing rich, iPhone-specific UIs for their web apps.  They would also gain from the having the developer community be able to invent new gestures, most of which will likely be confusing, but some of which may actually be adopted by the iPhone in future software iterations.</p>

<p>Granted, I recognize that writing code to recognize new gestures based on the low-level API I describe above is no small matter.  Consider something as simple as the "chord" effect being complicated by the diagonal chording gesture (currently supported in MacBook(Pro) trackpads): you would have to disambiguate finger fluctuations in such chording from the motion of spreading or pinching either by timed modes, tolerance thresholds, or some combination of the two.  Not for the faint of heart!</p>

<p>Anyhow, that's what I was wondering...</p>

<p>Still haven't decided if I'm in for version 1 (err, mass-market public beta 1, more likely.)  Some more <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/specials/iPhone.jsp" target="_blank">details from AT&T</a> would be helpful.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/will_iphone_javascript_engine.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/will_iphone_javascript_engine.html</guid>
         <category>Programming</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:42:34 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Ploughshares into Swords</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you may think about the state of war and peace in the world, it is clear <a title="<br />
    Global military spending hits $1.2 trillion: study<br />
| Reuters</p>

<p>" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL1119646120070611?feedType=RSS"><br />
we continue to melt down our ploughshares only to reforge them as swords.<br />
</a></p>

<p>And this is the world I have brought my children into... <sigh></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/ploughshares_into_swords.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/06/ploughshares_into_swords.html</guid>
         <category>News and Politics</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:03:56 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>AdSense in poor taste #98,472</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>What's wrong with this picture:</em></p>

<p><a href="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/images/adsense_conversion_1.png" target="_blank"><img alt="adsense_conversion_1.png" src="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/images/adsense_conversion_1.png" width="505" height="377"  /></a><br />
<br/></p>

<p><strong>Now for page 2:</em></p>

<p><a href="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/images/adsense_conversion_2.png" target="_blank"><img alt="adsense_conversion_2.png" src="http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/images/adsense_conversion_2.png"  width="505" height="377" /></a></p>

<p>Perhaps google was jealous, the article was about someone converting to Christianity, the ads were hawking conversion services to other religions...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/05/adsense_in_poor_taste_98472_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/05/adsense_in_poor_taste_98472_1.html</guid>
         <category>Internet</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:28:23 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>On Having Three Children</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here it is, the promised articulation that struck me a few days ago on the subject of having three children. (Parents or potential parents of multiples note, this probably doesn't apply to you):</p>

<ol>
<li>One child is hard.  Very hard.  Raising even one child (or at least, doing it <em>right</em>) requires enormous dedication, suspension or deferment of many goals and aspirations, and huge, heaping volumes of patience.  It is worth every loving moment, but should not be entered into lightly.</li>
<li>Two children is immensely harder than one child.  With one child, you can focus your undivided attention on him (in my case, first is a boy, so you will please suffer the pronoun), pour all your energy  into him and let none of his thoughts or sayings slip through your proverbial mental cracks.  With two children, you must divide your attention between them somehow.  You must keep the older from maiming the younger (in misguided attempts at affection.)  You should listen to all they both have to say, and play with both of them, even on the days when they want to play in totally different rooms.  Sometimes, one or the other will say something that <em>does</em> slip through the cracks, and you must deal with the consequences of that.  Even more patience is required, but now balance, and also an aura of justice and consistency that both kids must perceive clearly (whether it works in their favor or not.)  <strong>Raising two kids is really, really hard:</strong> if you felt like you were in over your head with one kid, stop now and raise him as best you can.  But if parenthood sits just right with you, and you feel your heart aching to love even more, bring another one home.  If that <em>still</em> doesn't satiate the aching in your heart, then...</li>
<li>Three children.  It's everything I said about two children, only there's one more.  That's it.  Really, that's it.  At least, so far that's it.  But having had two children, very different from each other and yet fitting together as a family system, it isn't hard to project with some clarity into the future how things will go.  And the future looks a little like the past, only better because there's one more of them to love (and to be loved by.)</li>
</ol>

<p>I suspect that four is probably a lot like three, only with one more.  I think the one->two transition was the real test of Parenthoodability™.  It was enormously difficult – and singularly rewarding – so much so that my dear wife and I felt compelled to do it again.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/04/on_having_three_children.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/04/on_having_three_children.html</guid>
         <category>Parenthood</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:02:49 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>I have a blog?!? Oh, yeah, that&apos;s right...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>'Nuff said on that subject...</p>

<p>So as an update, I'm a father!  I mean, again.  Three kids now.  "Table for five, please."  And he (numero tres) is such a beautiful boy.  But I'm supposed to say stuff like that, biased opinion and all that, so I'll stop there...</p>

<p>Or rather, digress into the articulation that struck me a few days ago on the subject of having three children.  I think it deserves it's own entry.  Stay tuned...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/04/i_have_a_blog_oh_yeah_thats_ri.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2007/04/i_have_a_blog_oh_yeah_thats_ri.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:38:46 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&quot;You suck differently than Mommy&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>File this under "conversations you never thought you'd have with your preschooler."</p>

<p>Context: I gave my son (or DS, if you insist) a kiss on the head, but he didn't want it.  (He's a preschooler – they can be so fickle.) So he said "suck it back out".  I've heard my wife and him play this game before, so I made a sucking noise and said, "there, I sucked it out."  He laughed and exclaimed, "you suck differently than Mommy!  You should suck like Mommy does!"<br />
What could I say, other than, "Yes, I do suck differently than Mommy.  That's just the way it is."  This actually went back-and-forth a few times, and I did everything I could to keep from laughing hysterically.</p>

<p>Now I can't decide what is funnier: this conversation, or the many, many conversations surrounding the character from the Toy Story movies, "Woody".  (He has several "Woody" toys, of varying sizes. Consider these past gems: "I have the big Woody now!", "Where is my little Woody?", "Can I bring Woody with me?", ad infinitum.)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2006/09/you_suck_differently_than_momm.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.ourironiclife.com/hyperbole/2006/09/you_suck_differently_than_momm.html</guid>
         <category>Parenthood</category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 15:36:26 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
